January 17, 2013

Review: Fire by Kristin Cashore


Fire by Kristin Cashore
Fire is the next installment in the Graceling books, a fantasy series where some people called gracelings develop a power-like ability that depending on what it is, can be helpful, useless or very dangerous. This book is a prequel, so it takes place years before the first book and features a whole different set of characters that in no way relate to those in Graceling. You could read them out of order, but my advice is to read them all, and to do it in the order they were published. Once you read them all, you will see how three books that stand alone well, are actually quite cohesive. 

The story takes place in the Dells, a land geographically separated from the original kingdoms by a set of mountains. As a result, the people from the Dells don’t know about the kingdoms and there are no gracelings. Instead, they have monsters. These creatures resemble regular animals, but have colorful appearances and are unnaturally appealing, in fact, they use that appeal to enthrall and lure their victims. Monsters crave other monsters and become ravenous in their presence, especially if they can smell blood. Worse, animals are not the only creatures that have a monster equivalent, humans also come in that form --albeit rarely-- and Fire, our heroine, is the last one of them.

Fire’s father, another monster, used to be the king’s advisor and right hand. Because human monsters can read and manipulate minds, he had control over everything and everyone, the king included. He died a few years ago, but what he did remains fresh in collective memory of the Dells, not to mention that the kingdom is in chaos in part because of his terrible influence. To Fire, being a monster is a curse, and the memory of a father who was absent most of the time, but loving a caring when he was with her, is a burden and a terrible source of guilt, because it clashes with all the evil things he did. So she hides, and lives an unassuming, quiet life, never using her powers. That is, until the new King asks (more like demands) her help. And so Fire’s adventure begins.

The type of events that develop in this book are more about political intrigue to prevent war and chaos, than about the main character’s journey, which is a bit secondary to everything else. It’s not supposed to be like that, and Fire’s story is complex enough to warrant our full attention, but the overall plot overshadows her, something that reflects poorly on her. Fire is a bit adrift throughout the story, and as much as I enjoyed the book, the fact that everything seemed to happen to her instead of making things happen, left me with a sense of missed opportunities. 

Fire spends the whole time being passive, and sacrificing herself out of the same sense of guilt that plagues her. I didn’t like her that much, but I loved her relationship with her father. He found her fascinating (and how much of it was love or monster appeal, is never clear), and in the few moments they shared, he was loving and caring. But early on, Fire became aware of his true self, so she both loved and hated him. That love gives her an almost unbearable guilt, because how can she feel that way for someone who was truly a monster? 

Perhaps one of the reasons why I’m tempted to nitpick is because I couldn’t help but compare it to Graceling (which I probably shouldn’t do). Both books are quite different, but Katsa and Fire share the same feeling of being cursed by their unwanted graces and powers. But Katsa comes to terms with her situation, embraces her grace and uses it to make a difference. Whereas Fire does nothing but regret her fate. Of course, Katsa didn’t have the same baggage, yet it was impossible for me not to feel like Katsa was a better heroine. 

I feel like Ms. Cashore was trying to portray a fairytale princess with a twist. So instead of being rescued by the prince, or in this case the general, Fire rescues herself. And in some ways she does succeed, but overall falls short.

Then there’s a secondary storyline featuring a character whose only purpose was to tie the books in the series together. At first I thought it was only a wink to certain developments in Graceling, but having read Bitterblue, I now understand why the plot was included. The problem is that it does nothing in this book, and because I’m judging it individually and not the series as a whole, I thought it was the one element in which Ms. Cashore missed her mark.

However, Ms. Cashore at her worst is still pretty good, and the fascinating world she has created continues to amaze me. The secondary characters were interesting, and the different relationship that developed between them and Fire, were nuanced. The story also has plenty of twist and turns that ultimately kept me glued to my seat. And because I know you’re wondering, there’s a sweet romance, a bit predictable, but appealing nonetheless. The book is far from perfect, but it has plenty of elements that make it worth reading, the most important being how wonderful a storyteller the author is, and that you would be missing out on something great if you decided to bypass it.

Review by Brie
Grade: 3
Sensuality: McDreamy
Purchase: Amazon

Synopsis:

It is not a peaceful time in the Dells. The young King Nash clings to his throne while rebel lords in the north and south build armies to unseat him. The mountains and forests are filled with spies and thieves and lawless men. 
This is where Fire lives. With a wild, irresistible appearance and hair the color of flame, Fire is the last remaining human monster. Equally hated and adored, she had the unique ability to control minds, but she guards her power, unwilling to steal the secrets of innocent people. Especially when she has so many of her own. 
Then Prince Brigan comes to bring her to King City, The royal family needs her help to uncover the plot against the king. Far away from home, Fire begins to realize there's more to her power than she ever dreamed. Her power could save the kingdom. 
If only she weren't afraid of becoming the monster her father was.

Fire (A Companion to Graceling) by Kristin Cashore
Dial. October 5, 2009

14 comments:

  1. Yeah I preferred Katsa and Graceling as well but I think I'd like to reread this one in light of the many bloggers I know prefer it. Just to give it another chance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you read Bitterblue? I think I'm going to re-read the three thinking of them as a unit and see how it goes. It wasn't a bad book, but I found it somewhat problematic.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked this a lot more than you, but that might be because I didn't do things in the way you recommend, and started with Fire, rather than Graceling.

    I didn't feel the plot overwhelmed Fire's journey. To me, this was all about Fire learning to trust herself, about her realising that she wasn't her father and that using her powers for the better good wasn't going to turn her into him.

    I also liked her more than you. Or rather, I loved that Cashore was willing to subvert the rules for heroines so much with her, both sexually, by allowing her to basically have a friend with benefits she's not at all in love with, and by allowing her to escape the "womanliness" stereotypes that insist that proper women are nurturing and can't be ruthless when necessary.

    I do agree about the secondary character who, to me, was completely pointless. I guessed his presence was mainly relevant to other books in the series, and it looks like that was right!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know you liked it more, and the positives reviews of people like Angie, make perfect sense. But I kept seeing all these problems, so even though I really enjoyed it, I also had lots of issues, many of which you already know ;-)

      "I also liked her more than you. Or rather, I loved that Cashore was willing to subvert the rules for heroines so much with her, both sexually, by allowing her to basically have a friend with benefits she's not at all in love with, and by allowing her to escape the "womanliness" stereotypes that insist that proper women are nurturing and can't be ruthless when necessary."

      That was something I loved, and I didn't mentioned it on the review because it was so long at one point I even considered cutting my explanation of the plot and writing "stuff happens" instead. But I loved how she enjoys sex, and even uses Archer for sex. In fact, I found their relationship more nuanced and fascinating, than her romance with Brigan. Her struggles with motherhood were heartbreaking, and overall this part of her character was, to me, her brightest moment. I agree that she subverts the role of the heroine, and of the fantasy princess/female character in general (that's why I said that in some ways the author succeeds at portraying a fairytale princess with a twist). And Cashore does this in all the books, but this was the less effective of the three.

      Have you read Bitterblue? You have to read Graceling first. Fire is the only one that (mostly) stands alone, but Graceling and Bitterblue are deeply connected. Go read them and then we will talk some more. Bitterblue was fantastic. That is all I'll say.

      Delete
    2. I haven't read the others yet, but I definitely will. I've got the audiobooks ready to go, but I didn't want to read them all in a row, for fear of burnout. I tend to enjoy series more when I space them out a bit.

      Delete
  4. I'm glad you read it, Brie. FIRE was about as much of a bulls-eye book as it's possible to be for me. But I can understand your points. I've reread FIRE the most of the three, but I think I'm due for a reread of GRACELING pretty soon and I'm interested to see how it feels. I loved it originally. But FIRE blew me away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, you can't be perfect all the time! Was it Pushing the Limits that you hated? *sigh* First, you don't appreciate fine, over the top, emotionally manipulative angst, and now this? You can go form a club with Rosario ;-)

      I read your review, and I get all the points you make. I doubt this is one of those books that get polarizing opinions and make me scratch my head when others don't see it as I did. Yo be honest, I wish I would have loved it more, it would have made the overall experience even sweeter.

      And because I'm asking the same to everyone: did you read Bitterblue? What did you think?

      Delete
  5. This is going to be mean of me, but I'm quite glad you didn't love Fire ^_^; It means I'm not completely off the mark ^_^; I read Graceling and then, Fire, and besides the character you mentioned, I could find the link between Fire and Graceling. It was hard for me coming in Fire and finding no links, no connection, because even though it says it's a companion book, I was expecting it.

    As a whole, the plot and the characters of Fire didn't do much for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOLOLOL! You didn't read Bitterblue, did you? It's very different, I kind of want you to read it just to see if the third time is a charm ;-)

      Delete
  6. Seems like you had many of the same feelings about Fire as I did. And the fact that there just seemed to be nothing happening for the majority of the book didn't help. You put things much more eloquently than I could. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ohh! I have to go read your review. I kind of like the "nothing happening" because it's very political, I think. The action takes a backseat to the intrigues and political machinations. In Bitterblue it's even more obvious, and that book is more like a mystery than an action/fantasy.

      Delete
  7. I'm so tempted to skip this one and go straight to Bitterblue. I haven't heard great things about this one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fire isn't bad! I know my review is mostly negative, but it was an entertaining book and I enjoyed it very much. Besides, I really recommend reading all three books, because Fire has a lot of elements that are key in Bitterblue.

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

FTC Disclaimer

The books reviewed here were purchased by us. If the book was provided by the author or publisher for review, it will be noted on the post. We do not get any type of monetary compensation from publishers or authors.